NRNP_6540_Week6_Application_Assignment

NRNP_6540_Week6_Application_Assignment

NRNP_6540_Week6_Application_Assignment

Assignment: Application – PICO Analysis of Dementia, Delirium, and Depression

To prepare:

Select one of the following disorders as your topic: dementia, delirium, or depression.
Review the guidelines in the “Literature Review Matrix” document in this week’s Learning Resources.
Think about a research question around your issue as indicated in Part I: PICO Analysis of Research Topic.

Consider the resources you will use, search terms and criteria, and Boolean search strings as indicated in Part II: Search Strategy.

Using the Walden Library and other appropriate databases, locate five articles related to your PICO question. At least one article must be a systematic review. All of the articles should be primary sources.
Reflect on the five articles you selected as indicated in Part III: Analysis of Literature. Consider the conceptual framework/theory, main finding, research method, strengths of study, weaknesses, and level of evidence for each article.

Consider how to use the summaries in Part III to create an evidence table. Use this evidence table to determine appropriate treatment options for patients who present with the disorder you selected as your topic.

To complete:

Formulate a question around the disorder you selected as indicated in Part I: PICO Analysis of Research Topic.

Identify the resources you will use, search terms and criteria, and Boolean search strings as indicated in Part II: Search Strategy.

Summarize the five articles you selected as indicated in Part III: Analysis of Literature. Describe the conceptual framework/theory, main finding, research method, strengths of study, weaknesses, and level of evidence for each article.

Create an evidence table based on the article summaries in Part III. Describe appropriate treatment options for patients based on this evidence table.

 

Rubric Detail

Select Grid View or List View to change the rubric’s layout.

Name: NRNP_6540_Week6_Application_Assignment Rubric

 

Grid View          List View

Quality of Work Submitted:

The extent of which work meets the

assigned criteria and work reflects graduate level critical and analytic thinking.

Excellent

Good

Fair

Poor

0 (0%) – 20

(20%)

Assignment superficially meets some of the

expectations.

Two or more

required topics are either not addressed or

4 (4%) – 4 (4%)

Purpose of the assignment is stated, yet is

brief and not descriptive.

inadequately addressed.

 

5 (5%) – 5 (5%)

A clear and

comprehensive purpose statement is

provided which delineates all

required criteria.

21 (21%) – 23

(23%)

Assignment meets most of the expectations. One required topic is either not addressed or inadequately addressed.

24 (24%) – 26

(26%)

Assignment meets

expectations. All topics are addressed with a minimum of 50%

containing good breadth and depth about each of the assignment topics.

27 (27%) – 30

(30%)

Assignment

 exceeds

expectations. All topics are addressed with a minimum of 75% containing

 exceptional breadth and depth about each of the assignment topics.

Quality of Work Submitted:

The purpose of the paper is

clear.

0 (0%) – 3 (3%)

3.5 (3.5%) – 3.5

(3.5%)

Purpose of the assignment is vague or o” topic.

No purpose statement was provided.

 

Excellent

Good

Fair

 

Poor
0 (0%) – 6 (6%)

Shows a lack of understanding of key

concepts,

deviates from topics.

 
0 (0%) – 13

(13%)

Includes and integrates specific

information from 0 to 1 resoruce to

support major points and

point of view.

 

 

 

 

 

Excellent

Good

Fair

 

Poor
0 (0%) – 13

(13%)

Rarely or does not interpret, apply, and synthesize

concepts, and/or strategies.

 

 

 

 

 

Excellent

Good

Fair

 

Poor
0 (0%) – 3 (3%)

Paragraphs and sentences follow writing standards for structure, flow, continuity and clarity < 60% of the time.

 
0 (0%) – 3 (3%)

Contains many (≥ 5) grammar, spelling, and

punctuation errors that

interfere with the reader’s understanding.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

  Excellent Good Fair Poor
Written Expression and Formatting

The paper follows correct APA format for title page, headings, font,

spacing, margins, indentations, page numbers, running head, parenthetical/in- text citations,

and reference list.

5 (5%) – 5 (5%)

Uses correct APA format with no errors.

4 (4%) – 4 (4%)

Contains a few (1-2) APA

format errors.

3.5 (3.5%) – 3.5

(3.5%)

Contains several (3-4) APA format errors.

0 (0%) – 3 (3%)

Contains many (≥ 5) APA

format errors.

         

 Paper Template

Part I: PICO Analysis of Research Topic

 

P: Patient or Population

 

I: Anticipated Intervention

 

C: Comparison group or Current standard

 

O: Outcome desired

 

Source: Adapted from Elkins (2010)

 

Step 1: Frame your clinical question using the PICO method.

 

P:

 

I:

 

C:

 

O:

 

Part II: Search Strategy

 

Using the Walden Library and other appropriate databases, locate five scholarly articles that pertain to a practice issue of interest to you and that is appropriate for an evidence-based practice project.

 

Step 1: Identify the resources you will utilize, or utilized, to find articles that pertain to your topic.

 

 

Electronic Databases Research or Professional Organizations Experts in the Field to Consult Books, Encyclopedias, Handbooks
       
       
       
       
       

 

Step 2: Identify search terms and criteria.

 

Keywords and Phrases

 

Major Authors Inclusion Criteria Exclusion Criteria
       
       
       
       
       
       
       
       
       

 

Step 3: Identify Boolean search strings.

 

 

 

 

Part III: Analysis of Literature

 

Step 1: Summarize the five articles you select from your search efforts in the table below.

 

Summary Table of Analyzed Articles (you may determine your own headings)

 

Citation Conceptual Framework/ Theory Main Finding Research Method Strengths of Study Weaknesses Level of Evidence
             
             
             
             
             

 

 

Step 2: Briefly summarize the history and purpose of your research question.

 

 

 

 

Step 3: Analyze the strengths and weaknesses of the existing literature.

 

Strengths

 

Weaknesses
   
   

 

 

Step 4: What gap exists in the current literature? Explain.

 

Elkins, M. Y. (2010). Using PICO and the brief report to answer clinical questions. Nursing, 40(4), 59–60.
Retrieved from the Walden Library databases.

 

 

Place your order
(550 words)

Approximate price: $22

Calculate the price of your order

550 words
We'll send you the first draft for approval by September 11, 2018 at 10:52 AM
Total price:
$26
The price is based on these factors:
Academic level
Number of pages
Urgency
Basic features
  • Free title page and bibliography
  • Unlimited revisions
  • Plagiarism-free guarantee
  • Money-back guarantee
  • 24/7 support
On-demand options
  • Writer’s samples
  • Part-by-part delivery
  • Overnight delivery
  • Copies of used sources
  • Expert Proofreading
Paper format
  • 275 words per page
  • 12 pt Arial/Times New Roman
  • Double line spacing
  • Any citation style (APA, MLA, Chicago/Turabian, Harvard)

Our guarantees

Delivering a high-quality product at a reasonable price is not enough anymore.
That’s why we have developed 5 beneficial guarantees that will make your experience with our service enjoyable, easy, and safe.

Money-back guarantee

You have to be 100% sure of the quality of your product to give a money-back guarantee. This describes us perfectly. Make sure that this guarantee is totally transparent.

Read more

Zero-plagiarism guarantee

Each paper is composed from scratch, according to your instructions. It is then checked by our plagiarism-detection software. There is no gap where plagiarism could squeeze in.

Read more

Free-revision policy

Thanks to our free revisions, there is no way for you to be unsatisfied. We will work on your paper until you are completely happy with the result.

Read more

Privacy policy

Your email is safe, as we store it according to international data protection rules. Your bank details are secure, as we use only reliable payment systems.

Read more

Fair-cooperation guarantee

By sending us your money, you buy the service we provide. Check out our terms and conditions if you prefer business talks to be laid out in official language.

Read more