Conflict Handling Styles Case Study
Conflict Handling Styles Case Study
Complete case study 14-7, ”Conflict Handling Styles,” located on pages 302-303 of Organizational Behavior in Health Care.
This assignment uses a grading rubric. Instructors will be using the rubric to grade the assignment; therefore, students should review the rubric prior to beginning the assignment to become familiar with the assignment criteria and expectations for successful completion of the assignment.
.
Rubric:
| Course Code | Class Code | Assignment Title | Total Points | ||||||
| HCA-615 | HCA-615-O500 | Conflict Handling Styles Case Study | 50.0 | ||||||
| Criteria | Percentage | Unsatisfactory (0.00%) | Less Than Satisfactory (65.00%) | Satisfactory (75.00%) | Good (85.00%) | Excellent (100.00%) | Comments | Points Earned | |
| Content | 90.0% | ||||||||
| Applies conflict handling style to scenario one. | 18.0% | Does not apply conflict handling style to scenario one. | Applies conflict handling style to scenario one, but selection of conflict handling style was not appropriate for the scenario. | Applies appropriate conflict handling style to scenario one. | Applies appropriate conflict handling style to scenario one and provides supporting evidence and details for the application by referencing some module readings or relating prior knowledge and experience. | Applies appropriate conflict handling style to scenario one and provides supporting evidence and details for the application by referencing all relevant module readings and relating prior knowledge and experience. | |||
| Applies conflict handling style to scenario two. | 18.0% | Does not apply conflict handling style to scenario two. | Applies conflict handling style to scenario two, but selection of conflict handling style was not appropriate for the scenario. | Applies appropriate conflict handling style to scenario two. | Applies appropriate conflict handling style to scenario two and provides supporting evidence and details for the application by referencing some module readings or relating prior knowledge and experience. | Applies appropriate conflict handling style to scenario two and provides supporting evidence and details for the application by referencing all relevant module readings and relating prior knowledge and experience. | |||
| Applies conflict handling style to scenario three. | 18.0% | Does not apply conflict handling style to scenario three. | Applies conflict handling style to scenario three, but selection of conflict handling style was not appropriate for the scenario. | Applies appropriate conflict handling style to scenario three. | Applies appropriate conflict handling style to scenario three and provides supporting evidence and details for the application by referencing some module readings or relating prior knowledge and experience. | Applies appropriate conflict handling style to scenario three and provides supporting evidence and details for the application by referencing all relevant module readings and relating prior knowledge and experience. | |||
| Applies conflict handling style to scenario four. | 18.0% | Does not apply conflict handling style to scenario four. | Applies conflict handling style to scenario four, but selection of conflict handling style was not appropriate for the scenario. | Applies appropriate conflict handling style to scenario four. | Applies appropriate conflict handling style to scenario four and provides supporting evidence and details for the application by referencing some module readings or relating prior knowledge and experience. | Applies appropriate conflict handling style to scenario four and provides supporting evidence and details for the application by referencing all relevant module readings and relating prior knowledge and experience. | |||
| Applies conflict handling style to scenario five. | 18.0% | Does not apply conflict handling style to scenario five. | Applies conflict handling style to scenario five, but selection of conflict handling style was not appropriate for the scenario. | Applies appropriate conflict handling style to scenario five. | Applies appropriate conflict handling style to scenario five and provides supporting evidence and details for the application by referencing some module readings or relating prior knowledge and experience. | Applies appropriate conflict handling style to scenario five and provides supporting evidence and details for the application by referencing all relevant module readings and relating prior knowledge and experience. | |||
| Organization and Effectiveness | 10.0% | ||||||||
| Mechanics of Writing (includes spelling, punctuation, grammar, and language use) | 10.0% | Surface errors are pervasive enough that they impede communication of meaning. Inappropriate word choice and/or sentence construction are employed. | Frequent and repetitive mechanical errors distract the reader. Inconsistencies in language choice (register) and/or word choice are present. | Some mechanical errors or typos are present, but are not overly distracting to the reader. Audience-appropriate language is employed. | Prose is largely free of mechanical errors, although a few may be present. The writer uses a variety of sentence structures and effective figures of speech. | The writer is clearly in command of standard, written academic English. | |||
| Total Weightage | 100% |