NU-740 : Week 8 Discussion: SPP Evidence-Based Practice Model

NU-740 : Week 8 Discussion: SPP Evidence-Based Practice Model
Week 8 Discussion: SPP Evidence-Based Practice Model
Due: In an effort to facilitate scholarly discourse, create your initial post by Day 3 and reply to at least two of your colleagues, on two separate days, by Day 7.
Grading Category: Discussions
Initial Post
This week you will determine your project approach and identify a practice Model best suited to guide your project. Moran et al. (2020) indicate that a “DNP projects use a variety of approaches including quality improvements, program and policy evaluation, evidence-based practice initiatives and components of quantitative and qualitative research methodologies to evaluate, innovate or improve practice.” Methods such as PDSA; Six Sigma; or RCA in a QI project or the IOWA; the Rosswurm and Larrabee or Stelter models on an EPB project need “congruence between the project aim(s) and the study design, and the data collection and the analysis plan” (Moran et al., 2020, p. 156). NU-740: Week 8 Discussion: SPP Evidence-Based Practice Model
In Moran et al. (2020, p. 157), review Table 7-1 for the various approaches to the DNP project that include research /practice-based inquiry, quality improvement, evidence-based practice, or program evaluation. As you begin to consider your project design,
1. Review and select the DNP approach consistent with your population, intervention, and outcome measurement for your study and provide a rationale for your selection.
2. Describe the EBP model that will guide your project and the rationale for choosing this EBP model. You may refer to Table 7-1: DNP Project Approaches (Moran et al. 2021 p. 157) in your text for guidance.
3. Define practice inquiry as it relates to the development of your scholarship practice project outlined in Holly (2019, p. 47) and the importance of practice inquiry as you develop your SPP proposal. NU-740: Week 8 Discussion: SPP Evidence-Based Practice Model
Your DNP project can take many forms. In Figure 5-2, Moran et al. (2020, p. 141), give some examples for review
Quality Improvement Projects (a focus on analyzing elements of specific areas of performance to gain some measure of improvement). Quality Improvement Projects might use Plan-Do-Study-Act, Six Sigma, Lean Methodology, Failure Mode Effect Analysis, Root Cause Analysis, or Structure Process Outcome to name a few frameworks.
Examples:
• Deploying a Geriatric Nurse Practitioner in an Emergency Department to Improve Outcomes for Geriatric Patients
• Fall Prevention in the Medical-Surgical Setting
• Optimizing Inpatient Heart Failure Education to Support Self-Care After Discharge
Translating Evidence into Practice Projects (incorporate evidence into practice; translate practice guidelines; develop, implement, and/or evaluate practice initiatives). Evidence-based Practice Projects might use the IOWA Model, the Advancing Research & Clinical Practice through Close Collaboration, the Academic Center for Evidence-Based Practice, the Promoting Action on Research Implementation, the Stetler Model, the John Hopkins Hospital Nursing Evidence-based Practice Model, the JBI Model of Evidence-based Healthcare, or the Rosswurm and Larrabee Model, to name a few. Regis College oftentimes uses the Rosswurm and Larrabee Model as an exemplar for evidence-based practice
Examples:
• Translation of Autism Screening Research into Practice
• An Evidence-Based Toolkit to Prevent Meningococcal Meningitis in College Students
• An Evidence-Based Ovarian Cancer Education Toolkit: A Pilot Study
• Evidence-Based Practice Update for Nurse Practitioners in Urgent Care
• Implementing Evidence-Based Practice in an Acute-Care Hospital
• Development of an Evidence-Based, In-Patient Alcohol Detoxification Guideline for Culturally Diverse Adults
Clinical or Practice-based Inquiry Projects (asking questions about clinical practice)
Examples: NU-740: Week 8 Discussion: SPP Evidence-Based Practice Model
• Predictors of the First-Year Nursing Students at Risk for Early Departure
• Prevalence of Symptoms in Multiple Sclerosis Patients
• The Predictive Value of Second Trimester Blood Pressures on the Development of Preeclampsia
Healthcare Delivery Innovation Projects (leading interdisciplinary teams, using technology to promote change, cultural competency advances)
Examples:
• Development of a Web-Based Health Information Database and Call Center
• A Web-Based Group Intervention for Patients with Recurrent or Metastatic Pancreatic Cancer
• Development of a Virtual Nursing Learning Lounge to Bridge the Practice Gap
• Interdisciplinary Simulation Training for Evidence-Based Obstetric Crisis Management
Program Development and Evaluation Projects. Program Evaluation Projects might use the CDC Framework, Logic Model, Balanced Scorecard, or Context, Input, Process and Product, to name a few.
Examples:
• A Strategic Plan for the Development of a Model of Care for HIV Co-Infected Diabetics in an Inner-City Clinic
• Smoking Cessation Program for Patients with Coronary Artery Disease
• An Evaluation of a School-Based Asthma Protocol
• A Medication Safety Education Program to Reduce the Risk of Harm Caused by Medication Errors
• Effectiveness of Chronic Disease Self-Management Programs for Mentally Ill Inmates with Diabetes
• A Multi-Method Approach to Evaluating Online Distance Learning in Nursing Education
• Strategic Plan for a Patient-Centered Medical Home Adaptation. NU-740 : Week 8 Discussion: SPP Evidence-Based Practice Model
• Development of a Strategic Plan for a Dedicated Education Unit and Clinical Teaching Associate Role
Demonstration Projects (test and measure the effects of program changes in real-world situations)
Examples:
• A Community Based Approach to Promoting Nutritional Awareness and Improving Dietary Habits
• Empowering Community Health: A Faith-Based Approach
• Safe Foot Care in African American Type 2 Diabetes
• Effects of Health Education on Nutrition and Physical Activity of School Children
Healthcare Policy (opportunities to advocate)
Examples:
• Leadership, Advocacy, and Policy: Development of a Professional Organization for Doctors of Nursing Practice
• Criterion-Based Job Description and Performance Assessment for the Advanced Practice Nurse
• Nursing Informatics Certification and Competencies: A Report on the Current State and Recommendations for the Future
• Nursing Incivility: Leadership Response
Generating New Evidence or Knowledge (quantitative, qualitative, mixed-methods research studies)
Replies
Review other students’ initial posts to gain additional insight on the topic of discussion. Review and reply to two posts.
Please refer to the Grading Rubric for details on how this activity will be graded.
Posting to the Discussion Forum
1. Select the appropriate Thread.
2. Select Reply.
3. Create your post.
4. Select Post to Forum.
Week 8: Learning Materials
Readings
Required
• Moran, K. J., Burson, R., & Conrad, D. (2020). The doctor of nursing practice project: A framework for success (3rd ed.). Jones & Bartlett Learning.
o Chapter 7: Aligning Design, Method, and Evaluation with the Clinical Question pp. 155-185.
• Holly, C. (2019). Practice-Based Scholarly Inquiry and the DNP Project (2nd ed.). Springer.
o Part 1 Chapter 3: The DNP Project
________________________________________
Instructional Materials
The expectation is that you will explore and review all instructional materials to meet the criteria of the course, further your understanding of course content, and help you prepare for upcoming assignments and exams.
• Moran, K. J., Burson, R., & Conrad, D. (2020). The doctor of nursing practice project: A framework for success (3rd ed.). Jones & Bartlett Learning.
• The Essentials of Doctoral Education for Advanced Nursing Practice (PDF) NU-740: Week 8 Discussion: SPP Evidence-Based Practice Model
Other posts:
Deliverable 4 – Corporate Art Collection Proposal
Chinese products in morocco
Language Barriers in Healthcare
PSC 410 Grand Canyon Week 5 Complete

Place your order
(550 words)

Approximate price: $22

Calculate the price of your order

550 words
We'll send you the first draft for approval by September 11, 2018 at 10:52 AM
Total price:
$26
The price is based on these factors:
Academic level
Number of pages
Urgency
Basic features
  • Free title page and bibliography
  • Unlimited revisions
  • Plagiarism-free guarantee
  • Money-back guarantee
  • 24/7 support
On-demand options
  • Writer’s samples
  • Part-by-part delivery
  • Overnight delivery
  • Copies of used sources
  • Expert Proofreading
Paper format
  • 275 words per page
  • 12 pt Arial/Times New Roman
  • Double line spacing
  • Any citation style (APA, MLA, Chicago/Turabian, Harvard)

Our guarantees

Delivering a high-quality product at a reasonable price is not enough anymore.
That’s why we have developed 5 beneficial guarantees that will make your experience with our service enjoyable, easy, and safe.

Money-back guarantee

You have to be 100% sure of the quality of your product to give a money-back guarantee. This describes us perfectly. Make sure that this guarantee is totally transparent.

Read more

Zero-plagiarism guarantee

Each paper is composed from scratch, according to your instructions. It is then checked by our plagiarism-detection software. There is no gap where plagiarism could squeeze in.

Read more

Free-revision policy

Thanks to our free revisions, there is no way for you to be unsatisfied. We will work on your paper until you are completely happy with the result.

Read more

Privacy policy

Your email is safe, as we store it according to international data protection rules. Your bank details are secure, as we use only reliable payment systems.

Read more

Fair-cooperation guarantee

By sending us your money, you buy the service we provide. Check out our terms and conditions if you prefer business talks to be laid out in official language.

Read more