Long Term Psychological Support

Long Term Psychological Support
Evaluation of Current Frameworks that Support Individuals with Long-Term Psychological Support
A current framework is an overarching system of beliefs, values, and assumptions that guide an individual or organization’s actions and decisions. A current framework can be thought of as a mental model that shapes how we see and interact with the world. Individuals and organizations develop current frameworks based on their experiences, values, and goals. Current frameworks can be helpful in guiding decision-making, but they can also lead to bias and tunnel vision. Several current frameworks have been developed to support individuals with long-term psychological conditions. This paper will evaluate the NICE (National Institute for Health and Care Excellence) Guidance and the House of Care- a framework for long term condition care as frameworks that support individuals who have been suffering from a psychological illness for a long time.
Framework 1
The first framework that will be evaluated is the NICE (National Institute for Health and Care Excellence) Guidance. The NICE Guidance framework is a set of evidence-based recommendations that aim to make the quality of care and support for individuals who have been suffering from a psychological illness for a long time better. The guidance covers a range of topics, including early intervention, diagnosis and care, support and treatment planning, and recovery-focused care. The guidance is based on the latest evidence and best practice, and is designed to be used by health and social care professionals, service users, and carers. The guidance covers a range of topics, including assessment, diagnosis, treatment, and managing of mental illnesses that last a long time.
It also includes information on how to support individuals with long term mental health conditions to live healthy and fulfilling lives. The NICE Guidance framework is an important tool for healthcare professionals who work with individuals who have been suffering from a psychological illness for a long time.
It will help them to offer their patients with the most suitable care and support, and to improve the quality of life for individuals who have been suffering from a psychological illness for a long time. The guidance is based on the latest evidence and best practice, and aspires to enhance care and support quality that individuals with long term mental health conditions receive. The framework was developed in response to the growing number of people living with chronic conditions, as well as the challenges associated with providing care for this population.
The goal of the guidance is to improve the quality of care and support for people with chronic conditions, and to make sure that they receive the best possible health outcomes (Horan, 2005). One of the key elements of the guidance is the importance of self-management. People with chronic conditions need to be empowered to manage their own health, and this starts with education and information. They need to understand their condition, and what they can do to stay healthy and manage their symptoms. Care planning is another key element of the guidance. People with chronic conditions should have a care plan that is customized to their personal necessities. The care plan should be developed in collaboration with the person with the condition, and should be reviewed on a regular basis.
Transitions of care are also important, and the guidance includes recommendations on how to manage these effectively. People with chronic conditions often need to see multiple health care providers, and it is important that there is good communication between all of the providers involved in their care. Finally, the guidance includes recommendations on end-of-life care. People with chronic conditions often have complex needs, and it is important that their care is planned in advance. The guidance includes recommendations on advance care planning, as well as on the management of pain and other symptoms (Butcher, 2001).
One strength of the NICE guidance framework is that it is evidence-based. The guidance is based on the best available evidence and is regularly updated to reflect new research. This ensures that individuals with long term physiological conditions are receiving the most up-to-date and effective care. For example, the NICE guidance on diabetes states that “People with diabetes should be offered regular reviews of their condition and treatment. These should be at least annually, and more often if the person’s condition is not well controlled”. This recommendation is based on research showing that regular reviews improve diabetes control. Therefore, individuals with diabetes who follow the NICE guidance are more likely to receive effective care that improves their condition.
Another strength of the NICE guidance framework is its comprehensiveness. The guidance covers a wide range of topics, from diagnosis to self-management. This comprehensive approach ensures that individuals with long term physiological conditions have access to all the information and support they need. For example, the NICE guidance on heart disease includes recommendations on lifestyle changes that can help to prevent the condition (Harris & Mayo, 2017). This is important because many cases of heart disease are preventable. By providing comprehensive guidance, NICE ensures that individuals with long term physiological conditions have the best chance of preventing or managing their condition.
Even with these strengths, the framework is also associated with some weaknesses. First and foremost, the National Institute for Health and Care Excellence (NICE) guidance framework for supporting individuals with long term physiological conditions is not comprehensive. It does not cover all potential health conditions that could be considered long term. Additionally, it does not provide detailed guidance on how to support individuals with long term physiological conditions. Moreover, there is no clear guidance on how to identify or assess the needs of individuals with long term physiological conditions. This can make it difficult for health and care professionals to provide the appropriate level of support to individuals with long term physiological conditions. Secondly, the guidance framework does not take into account the individual’s preferences and needs. It is prescriptive and does not allow for flexibility in how support is provided. This can make it difficult to meet the individual’s needs and preferences, and can result in an all-encompassing approach that does not meet the needs of all people with long term physiological conditions.
The National Institute for Health and Care Excellence (NICE) guidance framework for providing support to individuals with long term physiological conditions can be considered to be successful in supporting long term conditions for a number of reasons. First and foremost, the guidance provides a clear framework for social and health care professionals to follow when supporting individuals with long term conditions. This includes recommendations on how to assess and manage the individual’s condition, as well as how to provide support and advice on self-management. Secondly, the guidance is based on the latest evidence and best practice, meaning that it is up-to-date and relevant. This is important as it means that health and social care professionals can be confident that they are using the most effective methods to support individuals with long term conditions. Thirdly, the guidance is flexible and can be adapted to meet the needs of individual patients. This is important as it means that patients can receive the best possible care that is tailored to their individual needs. Overall, the NICE guidance framework for supporting individuals who have been suffering from a psychological illness for a long time can be considered to be successful in supporting long-term conditions.
However, the framework still has a large room for improvement. First, it could provide more detailed guidance on how to support individuals with specific long-term conditions. For example, NICE guidelines could provide guidance on how to support individuals with chronic pain, diabetes, or heart disease. Second, NICE guidelines could provide guidance on how to better coordinate care for individuals with long-term conditions. For example, NICE guidelines could provide guidance on how to ensure that individuals with long-term conditions receive the care they need from different health care providers. Third, NICE could provide guidance on how to better support individuals with long-term conditions to live healthy and fulfilling lives. For example, NICE guidelines could provide guidance on how to help people who have been suffering from a psychological illness for a long time to stay active and to eat a healthy diet.
Framework 2
The House of Care is a framework for supporting long-term condition care that was developed by the Department of Health in England. It is based on the principle of coordinated care, which involves all members of the care team working together to support the individual. The House of Care has four key components: 1. A care plan that is developed and agreed upon by the individual and the care team. 2. A care team that is composed of a variety of health and social care professionals. 3. A system of care that is coordinated by a care coordinator. 4. A set of support services that are available to the individual and the care team. The House of Care has been shown to improve the quality of care for long-term conditions, and to reduce the number of hospital admissions and emergency department visits.
The framework is designed to help career and health professionals to work together to support the individual in managing their condition. The framework includes four key areas. The first area is self-management. This involves the individual taking responsibility for their own health and wellbeing. They should be supported to develop the skills and knowledge to manage their condition. The second area is shared decision making: This involves the individual working with their career and health professionals to make decisions about their care. It is important that the individual feels involved in and empowered by the decisions made about their care. The third area is integrated care. This involves the career and health professionals working together to provide coordinated and seamless care. This can help to ensure that the individual receives the best possible care and support. The fourth area is person-centered care. This involves the career and health professionals working together to meet the individual’s needs and preferences. This can help to ensure that the individual feels supported and involved in their own care.
There are two key strengths of the House of Care framework. Firstly, the framework is flexible. It can be adapted to meet the needs of individual patients. This is important because not all patients will have the same needs. Some patients may require more support than others. The House of Care is a well-rounded framework that can be customized to meet the needs of individual patients. This makes it a very strong tool for supporting long-term condition care. The framework is patient-centered. The House of Care framework is patient-centered. The framework recognizes that patients should be involved in their own care and that care should be tailored to meet the individual needs of each patient.
Secondly, the framework takes a holistic approach to health and wellbeing, recognizing that physical, mental, social, and spiritual health are all interlinked. The framework therefore supports individuals to address all aspects of their health and wellbeing, not just their physical health. This is important because all of these factors can affect a person’s ability to manage their condition.
The framework has been found to be effective in improving patient outcomes, but there are some weaknesses that should be considered. First and foremost, the House of Care framework relies heavily on self-management. This means that patients are expected to take an active role in managing their condition, which can be difficult for some people. Additionally, the framework does not always take into account the social and psychological factors that can impact a person’s ability to self-manage their condition. Secondly, the House of Care framework can be inflexible. This is because the framework is designed to be used in a certain way and deviating from this can lead to less effective care. This can be problematic for healthcare professionals who need to adapt the framework to meet the needs of their patients.
The House of Care has been evaluated in a number of studies and has been found to be effective in supporting patients with long-term conditions. One study found that patients who used the House of Care reported improvements in their health and wellbeing, and felt more empowered to self-manage their condition. Another study found that the House of Care improved communication between patients and healthcare professionals, and resulted in better self-care management by patients. Overall, the House of Care appears to be a successful framework for supporting long-term condition care. It is based on the principle of self-care, which is an important aspect of managing any chronic condition. The House of Care also provides patients with a care plan that is agreed between the patient and their healthcare team, which can help to ensure that all aspects of the patient’s care are considered and planned for.
There are a number of ways in which the House of Care framework can be improved. One way is to increase the focus on self-management. Self-management is an important part of managing a long-term condition. It can help people to stay healthy and to avoid hospital admissions. Another way to improve the House of Care framework is to increase the focus on prevention. Prevention is important in managing long-term conditions. It can help to prevent the condition from getting worse and can also help to avoid hospital admissions. A third way to improve the House of Care framework is to increase the focus on care coordination. Care coordination is important in managing long-term conditions. It can help to ensure that people receive the care they need from the different health care professionals involved in their care. Finally, a fourth way to improve the House of Care framework is to increase the focus on communication. Communication is important in managing long-term conditions. It can help to ensure that people receive the information they need about their condition and can also help to avoid misunderstandings.
References
Butcher, M. (2001). NICE Clinical Guidelines: pressure ulcer risk assessment and prevention-a review. World Wide Wounds, 26.
Harris, J., & Mayo, P. (2017). Heart failure self-management with the House of Care model. British Journal of Cardiac Nursing, 12(2), 70-75.
Horan, S. (2005). NICE work. Occupational Health & Wellbeing, 57(3), 18.
Other posts:
Measures of Central Tendency and Variation
ACC 371 Full Course Intermediate Accounting II
Immune Mechanisms Discussion
How far are you from the image of the cyclist?

Place your order
(550 words)

Approximate price: $22

Calculate the price of your order

550 words
We'll send you the first draft for approval by September 11, 2018 at 10:52 AM
Total price:
$26
The price is based on these factors:
Academic level
Number of pages
Urgency
Basic features
  • Free title page and bibliography
  • Unlimited revisions
  • Plagiarism-free guarantee
  • Money-back guarantee
  • 24/7 support
On-demand options
  • Writer’s samples
  • Part-by-part delivery
  • Overnight delivery
  • Copies of used sources
  • Expert Proofreading
Paper format
  • 275 words per page
  • 12 pt Arial/Times New Roman
  • Double line spacing
  • Any citation style (APA, MLA, Chicago/Turabian, Harvard)

Our guarantees

Delivering a high-quality product at a reasonable price is not enough anymore.
That’s why we have developed 5 beneficial guarantees that will make your experience with our service enjoyable, easy, and safe.

Money-back guarantee

You have to be 100% sure of the quality of your product to give a money-back guarantee. This describes us perfectly. Make sure that this guarantee is totally transparent.

Read more

Zero-plagiarism guarantee

Each paper is composed from scratch, according to your instructions. It is then checked by our plagiarism-detection software. There is no gap where plagiarism could squeeze in.

Read more

Free-revision policy

Thanks to our free revisions, there is no way for you to be unsatisfied. We will work on your paper until you are completely happy with the result.

Read more

Privacy policy

Your email is safe, as we store it according to international data protection rules. Your bank details are secure, as we use only reliable payment systems.

Read more

Fair-cooperation guarantee

By sending us your money, you buy the service we provide. Check out our terms and conditions if you prefer business talks to be laid out in official language.

Read more